Shmaisani-Hussaini Complex,
Shmaisani, Amman, Jordan
Introduction
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) encompasses a range of methodologies employed to resolve conflicts and disputes outside the traditional judicial system. ADR includes various mechanisms such as negotiation, reconciliation, mediation, and arbitration. Among these, arbitration stands out as a formalized legal process wherein disputes are adjudicated by a designated arbitrator or panel, whose decisions are binding. This process can address conflicts involving individuals, groups, or even nations. The term "arbitrator" or "arbitral tribunal" refers to the individuals appointed to adjudicate the dispute, as highlighted in the Quranic injunction: "And if you fear dissension between them, send an arbitrator from his family and an arbitrator from her family" (Quran 4:35). Some legal scholars describe arbitration as "private adjudication" because, while it operates under the auspices of national laws, it typically operates outside the direct control of state judicial authorities.
Arbitration has become a prevalent method for resolving international contracts, with arbitration clauses commonly embedded in international agreements. This form of arbitration, known as "voluntary arbitration," is agreed upon by parties to resolve disputes arising from a contract through arbitration rather than litigation. For instance, a contract between a German company and a Venezuelan firm for a sugar transaction might stipulate that any disputes related to the contract be resolved through arbitration under German law or the rules of the American Arbitration Association (AAA). Should a dispute arise, the matter would be referred to arbitration in accordance with the agreed terms, and a court would dismiss or refer the case for arbitration if it is stipulated in the contract.
This paper will explore four key aspects of arbitration:
1. Arbitration Agreements and Their Organization
2. Advantages of Arbitration
3. Disadvantages of Arbitration
4. International Arbitration in Arab States
Arbitration Agreements and Their Organization
An arbitration agreement may be incorporated into the original contract or exist as a separate arbitration agreement. The arbitration clause may either provide for a free arbitration process or mandate the use of a specific arbitration institution. Arbitration can be classified as either "foreign" or "international," and these distinctions will be elaborated upon.
Arbitration Clause and Arbitration Agreement
- Arbitration Clause: An arbitration clause is a provision within a contract that stipulates the resolution of future disputes through arbitration. This approach has gained popularity as commercial entities seek to avoid national courts and prefer arbitration. It is advisable that an arbitration clause include fundamental details such as the applicable substantive law, procedural rules, the language of arbitration, and the venue.
- Arbitration Agreement: An arbitration agreement is a contract made by the parties after a dispute arises, which refers the dispute to arbitration. This typically occurs when the original contract lacks an arbitration clause. For instance, if parties initially sign a contract without an arbitration clause but later face a dispute, they may agree to resolve the dispute through arbitration, forming a new contract dedicated to this purpose.
Free vs. Institutional Arbitration
- Ad Hoc Arbitration: This refers to arbitration where the parties select arbitrators and procedural rules independently, without referring to a specific arbitration institution. The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules are commonly used in such cases, providing a set of procedural rules if the parties choose to adopt them. These rules have gained widespread acceptance in international arbitration.
- Institutional Arbitration: This type involves referring disputes to an established arbitration institution, such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) in Paris, the American Arbitration Association (AAA), the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), or the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). Institutional arbitration provides a structured framework for the arbitration process, including appointing arbitrators and managing proceedings.
Foreign vs. International Arbitration
- Foreign Arbitration: The New York Convention of 1958 requires member states to recognize and enforce foreign arbitration awards. An award made in one country is considered foreign in another, necessitating adherence to the Convention for enforcement.
- International Arbitration: According to the UNCITRAL Model Law, arbitration is deemed international if:
1. The parties’ places of business are in different countries.
2. The place of arbitration or a significant part of the contract performance is outside the parties' country.
3. The parties have explicitly agreed that the arbitration pertains to multiple countries.
Advantages of Arbitration
Procedural Simplicity
Arbitration is often characterized by procedural flexibility, allowing arbitrators greater discretion compared to national courts in managing notifications, hearings, evidence presentation, and expert testimonies. This can result in quicker resolutions.
Selection of Arbitrators
Parties have the opportunity to select arbitrators with relevant expertise, either directly or through recommendations. This contrasts with national courts, where judges are appointed through state mechanisms, and parties have limited input.
Confidentiality
Arbitration proceedings are typically confidential, shielding parties from public scrutiny and potential reputational risks associated with public court trials.
Disadvantages of Arbitration
Costs and Expenses
While arbitration can be cost-effective in some jurisdictions, it can be expensive, particularly when involving international arbitrators and multiple parties from different countries. This is exacerbated in institutional arbitration, where administrative fees can be significant.
Perceptions of Arbitrator Bias
There may be concerns regarding the neutrality of arbitrators, with some parties fearing that an arbitrator might favor the party that appointed them. Despite the expectation of impartiality, biases can sometimes influence the process.
Legal System Diversity
The diversity of legal systems among parties and arbitrators can complicate proceedings, particularly when arbitrators are unfamiliar with the applicable legal framework. This can lead to extended arbitration periods and increased complexity.
Enforcement Challenges
Enforcing arbitration awards can pose practical difficulties, especially if the losing party resists compliance. The New York Convention mitigates some issues, but enforcement remains a potential challenge.
International Arbitration in Arab States
Given the increasing significance of international arbitration, many Arab countries have engaged with arbitration through various means, including international agreements and national legislation aligned with international standards. Eleven Arab states are parties to the New York Convention of 1958. Key regional agreements include:
- Arab Investment Guarantee Corporation Convention (1970): Provides for dispute resolution through negotiation, conciliation, or arbitration.
- Agreement on Investment Dispute Settlement (1974): Addresses disputes between Arab states and their nationals.
- Unified Arab Investment Agreement (1980): Includes provisions for dispute resolution through arbitration.
- Arab Commercial Arbitration Convention (1987): Establishes a comprehensive framework for commercial arbitration within an integrated Arab institution.
Additionally, agreements such as the 1952 Arab Convention on the Execution of Judgments and the 1983 Riyadh Arab Judicial Cooperation Convention address the enforcement of arbitration awards within the Arab world.
Conclusion
The practical reality indicates a growing reliance on international arbitration for resolving disputes arising from international contracts. This trend underscores the importance of continually refining and advancing arbitration practices and overcoming challenges related to enforcement and procedural complexity. The continued evolution and adoption of arbitration practices will contribute to its effectiveness as a preferred method for international dispute resolution.
Share This News